FSFE
/
fsfe-website
29
30
Fork 85
Código Incidencias 62 Pull Requests 14 Wiki Actividad

Typo fixing 

svn path=/trunk/; revision=34465
Este commit está contenido en:
guest-Besnik_b 2016-11-06 08:53:02 +00:00
padre e20e8307ec
commit 1afa8230f8
Se han modificado 1 ficheros con 6 adiciones y 6 borrados
Mostrar estadísticas Descargar archivo de parche Descargar archivo de diferencias Expandir todos los archivos Contraer todos los archivos

12
activities/os/os.en.xhtml
Ver fichero

@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ for contrary purposes than promoting competition and interoperability.</p>
<p>The full competition in the market is, therefore, provided by standards
that are open. As Open Standards are freely available without any restrictions,
they allow standardised technology to be used in products and services
without any a priori advanatage based on the ownership of the standard.
without any a priori advantage based on the ownership of the standard.
As a consequence, the access to technology is allowed to all actors on
the market irrespective of one's business model.</p>
@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ vendors, or as a complete implementation equally available to all
parties.</li>
</ol>
<p>This way the standard ensures that technology is accesible for everyone,
irrespetive of business-model, size, or exclusive rights portfolio. </p>
<p>This way the standard ensures that technology is accessible for everyone,
irrespective of business-model, size, or exclusive rights portfolio. </p>
<h2 id="why-should-a-stanard-be-minimalistic">Why should a standard be minimalistic?</h2>
@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ address both the specification and implementation.</p>
<p>Consequently, for open implementations it is economically more beneficial
to publish reference implementations under a Free Software licence.
This will allow the reference implementation to be freely available and
also act as a formal specification wthout the institutional process of
tandard setting.</p>
also act as a formal specification without the institutional process of
standard setting.</p>
<h3 id="patents-in-standards">Patents in standards</h3>
@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ the imposed terms are objectively 'fair' or 'non-discriminatory'.
Consequently, FRAND can be used as a tool to manipulate the standardisation
process to exclude competition.</p>
<p>While RF licensing is adressing only the royalty-payment criteria,
<p>While RF licensing is addressing only the royalty-payment criteria,
it does not address other restrictions that may be placed on adoption
and implementation of a standard by Free Software. In this regard, the
licensing policies of patented technology in standardisation have to be