FSFE
/
fsfe-website
29
30
Fork 85
Code Issues 62 Pull Requests 14 Wiki Activity

Fixed some typos 

svn path=/trunk/; revision=7420
This commit is contained in:
cri 2006-12-10 16:49:34 +00:00
parent 7c0931db35
commit 0bd01a073c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
projects/gplv3/barcelona-rms-transcript.en.xhtml
View File

@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ happens, their users do not have the four freedoms. They are
subjugated. So this is a practice that undermines the freedom of the subjugated. So this is a practice that undermines the freedom of the
whole community. Therefore, having seen this, at the beginning of the whole community. Therefore, having seen this, at the beginning of the
GNU project, I conceived a way of preventing this problem from GNU project, I conceived a way of preventing this problem from
occuring. occurring.
</p> </p>
<p class="indent"> <p class="indent">
@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ do them both.
There are several primary areas where version 3 is There are several primary areas where version 3 is
different from version 2. One is in regard to tivoisation. Now, different from version 2. One is in regard to tivoisation. Now,
you've probably never heard the term &quot;tivoisation&quot;, because I made it you've probably never heard the term &quot;tivoisation&quot;, because I made it
up, but it's an extrememly important threat to our freedom. It's up, but it's an extremely important threat to our freedom. It's
named after a product called the &quot;TiVo&quot;, which is capable of recording named after a product called the &quot;TiVo&quot;, which is capable of recording
many television channels at once and then the user can watch any of many television channels at once and then the user can watch any of
the shows later on. the shows later on.
@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ the user installs modified versions they can't really function.
Tivoisation turns freedom number 1 into a sham. Freedom 1 is the Tivoisation turns freedom number 1 into a sham. Freedom 1 is the
freedom to study the source code and change it so that the program freedom to study the source code and change it so that the program
does what you want. With tivoisation, this freedom becomes purely does what you want. With tivoisation, this freedom becomes purely
theorectical. Yes, you can change the program so that it could be theoretical. Yes, you can change the program so that it could be
run in some other machine, and that might be useful for someone, but run in some other machine, and that might be useful for someone, but
you can't change it and run it on the TiVo, and this is a deliberate you can't change it and run it on the TiVo, and this is a deliberate
restriction that they impose on the public. restriction that they impose on the public.
@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ Now I will answer questions.
There's one other thing I should say. It's a very general thing. There's one other thing I should say. It's a very general thing.
Governments that impose harsh restrictions on their citizens, backed Governments that impose harsh restrictions on their citizens, backed
up by cruel punishments, on behalf of corporations, are showing that up by cruel punishments, on behalf of corporations, are showing that
they are not really on the citizens's side. They're not working for they are not really on the citizens' side. They're not working for
us, they don't represent us except with lip service. They represent us, they don't represent us except with lip service. They represent
the corporations and their goal is to rule us. These governments are the corporations and their goal is to rule us. These governments are
democratic only in name. And since governments get their legitimacy democratic only in name. And since governments get their legitimacy
@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ their licences in a way that's compatible with the GNU GPL.
<p id="q3-lgpl-when"> <p id="q3-lgpl-when">
Q3: Will the new version of the LGPL become public at the same time as Q3: Will the new version of the LGPL become public at the same time as
the second dicussion draft of the GPL? the second discussion draft of the GPL?
</p> </p>
<p class="indent"> <p class="indent">