@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ do them both. There are several primary areas where version 3 is different from version 2. One is in regard to tivoisation. Now, you've probably never heard the term "tivoisation", because I made it -up, but it's an extrememly important threat to our freedom. It's +up, but it's an extremely important threat to our freedom. It's named after a product called the "TiVo", which is capable of recording many television channels at once and then the user can watch any of the shows later on. @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ the user installs modified versions they can't really function. Tivoisation turns freedom number 1 into a sham. Freedom 1 is the freedom to study the source code and change it so that the program does what you want. With tivoisation, this freedom becomes purely -theorectical. Yes, you can change the program so that it could be +theoretical. Yes, you can change the program so that it could be run in some other machine, and that might be useful for someone, but you can't change it and run it on the TiVo, and this is a deliberate restriction that they impose on the public. @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ Now I will answer questions. There's one other thing I should say. It's a very general thing. Governments that impose harsh restrictions on their citizens, backed up by cruel punishments, on behalf of corporations, are showing that -they are not really on the citizens's side. They're not working for +they are not really on the citizens' side. They're not working for us, they don't represent us except with lip service. They represent the corporations and their goal is to rule us. These governments are democratic only in name. And since governments get their legitimacy @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ their licences in a way that's compatible with the GNU GPL.
Q3: Will the new version of the LGPL become public at the same time as -the second dicussion draft of the GPL? +the second discussion draft of the GPL?