2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-17 17:39:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<html newsdate="2010-07-04" type="newsletter">
|
2020-04-15 09:46:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<version>1</version>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
|
|
|
<title>FSFE Newsletter - July 2010</title>
|
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h1>FSFE Newsletter - July 2010</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-01 09:03:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>This edition covers Neelie Kroes' statement about Open
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Standards, the Free Software discussion in Saxony (Germany), and the
|
|
|
|
|
relicensing of WebM to be GPL compatible, and asks you all to keep in touch
|
|
|
|
|
with your politicians about Free Software issues.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>Beside that, FSFE's strategic decision making body, the <a
|
2017-06-16 12:23:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="/about/team.html">General Assembly</a> (GA) ,
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
met in Bozen, Italy. The various outcomes of this meeting will become
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
apparent in the next months and years. On the operational side we organised
|
2020-06-10 05:25:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/FellowshipEvents">Fellowship meetings</a> in
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Tampere (Finland), Göteburg (Sweden), Paris, Lille (France), Berlin,
|
|
|
|
|
Düsseldorf, Siegen, (Germany), as well as a Fellowship jabber meeting about
|
|
|
|
|
ACTA. Stian published a new <a
|
2020-06-11 05:35:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/fellowship-interviews/david-reyes-samblas-martinez/">Fellowship
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
interview with David Reyes Samblas Martinez</a>, in which he answers
|
|
|
|
|
questions on hardware manufacturing, e-learning and Free Software
|
|
|
|
|
politics.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>"Proprietary technology is a waste of money"</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>No, this is not a quote from someone out of the Free Software community.
|
2020-06-11 05:35:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
As <a href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/?p=359">Karsten reported in his
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
article</a> it was Neelie Kroes, European Commission’s vice president, who
|
2010-07-27 07:58:11 +00:00
|
|
|
|
commented at the Open Forum Europe (OFE) meeting in Brussels on 10 June. She
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
also said that:</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><p>"Many authorities have found themselves unintentionally locked
|
|
|
|
|
into proprietary technology for decades. After a certain point that
|
|
|
|
|
original choice becomes so ingrained that alternatives risk being
|
|
|
|
|
systematically ignored, no matter what the potential benefits. This is a
|
|
|
|
|
waste of public money that most public bodies can no longer
|
|
|
|
|
afford."</p></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>Kroes also backed up <a
|
2012-07-20 14:46:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="/activities/os/def.html">our definition of Open
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Standards</a>. She made clear that "truly open" standards "do not come with
|
|
|
|
|
any constraints for implementers". This is important as it means that
|
|
|
|
|
programmers can implement a standard in Free Software; Microsoft and others
|
|
|
|
|
have been trying to convince the Commission that a standard is "open" even if
|
|
|
|
|
it cannot be implemented in Free Software. These developments are good news -
|
|
|
|
|
please share them!</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>"Free" State of Saxony argues against Free Software</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Already in May German politicians had a discussion about Free Software in
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
the Free State of Saxony's state parliament. I (Matthias) published an <a
|
2020-06-11 05:35:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="https://blogs.fsfe.org/mk/?p=589">analysis about this
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
discussion</a> (in German). The state government talks about strategic
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
reasons against Free Software, but does not name any of them. The CDU and the
|
|
|
|
|
FDP say they do not want to influence the market. On the other hand the state
|
|
|
|
|
government educates all their pupils with software from a monopolist and
|
|
|
|
|
advertises Adobe's proprietary software on their websites. In their tenders
|
|
|
|
|
they do not ask for Free Software, but complain that there are too few Free
|
|
|
|
|
Software service providers and programs. Beside that they use the term
|
|
|
|
|
"market standards" against Free Software.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>That such discussions happen in parliament are a very good sign. They mean
|
|
|
|
|
that politicians have to think about Free Software, and that we can all enter
|
|
|
|
|
discussion with politicians about Free Software, too. That is why we asked
|
|
|
|
|
people from Saxony to send their politicians feedback on the discussion, and
|
|
|
|
|
to write them what they liked about the discussion and ask questions like
|
|
|
|
|
‘when politicians talk about strategic reasons against Free Software, what
|
|
|
|
|
are these reasons?’. The speech by Neelie Kroes quoted above is also
|
|
|
|
|
something that you can point politicians to.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Free Video Formats / Software licenses</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-30 07:56:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>In May, Google <a
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/googles-updated-webm-license">Updated
|
|
|
|
|
the license for their WebM project</a> to make it GPL-compatible. As
|
2010-06-30 07:59:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
explained <a href="/news/nl/nl-201006.en.html">in the last
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
issue</a> WebM is important so users do not have to install the non-free
|
|
|
|
|
flash plugins anymore, but have a free video format to play and encode
|
|
|
|
|
videos.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>WebM was already Free Software, as the rightsholders stated in the licence
|
|
|
|
|
that users have the freedom to use, study, share, and improve it. The problem
|
|
|
|
|
was that its license was not compatible with the <a
|
|
|
|
|
href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public
|
|
|
|
|
License (GPL)</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>There are <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/">a lot of Free
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses</a>, but the GNU GPL is the most famous Free Software
|
|
|
|
|
copyleft license and is used by a large percentage of Free Software. It
|
|
|
|
|
ensures the four freedoms and adds the condition that those freedoms remain
|
|
|
|
|
intact in further distribution of the software.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>If people use the same licence or at least GPL-compatible licences, then
|
|
|
|
|
programmers can exchange code freely, and easily, so programmers do not have
|
|
|
|
|
to reinvent the wheel again but can use already existing code. That is why it
|
|
|
|
|
is so important that programmers use the <a
|
2010-06-30 08:22:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html">GNU AGPL</a>, GPL, <a
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html">LGPL</a>, or a compatible Free
|
|
|
|
|
Software license for their software. There is also an article by David
|
|
|
|
|
Wheeler which is worth reading, <a
|
|
|
|
|
href="http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/gpl-compatible.html">why you should
|
|
|
|
|
make your software GPL compatible</a>, like WebM does now.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-26 14:50:42 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<h2>Get active: Support us gathering speeches about Free Software</h2>
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Our mission is to explain the concept of Free Software to as many people as
|
|
|
|
|
possible. This month the German team had a booth at the GNU/Linuxtag in
|
|
|
|
|
Berlin and explained Free Software to all the different visitors, gave
|
|
|
|
|
interviews and speeches about "Freedom in the cloud" and common
|
|
|
|
|
misunderstandings about Free Software. Depending on the audience you should
|
|
|
|
|
use slightly modified explanations. To support Free Software supporters, we
|
2020-06-10 05:25:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
are providing links to <a href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Video">video</a> and <a
|
|
|
|
|
href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Audio">audio</a> files, as well as <a
|
|
|
|
|
href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/Transcripts">transcripts of speeches</a>.</p>
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p><a href="http://fellowship.fsfe.org">As Fellow</a> you automatically have an
|
|
|
|
|
account there, but you can just <a
|
2020-06-10 05:25:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
href="https://wiki.fsfe.org/UserGuide?action=newaccount">register for a
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
guest account</a> and help us to make those pages a good resource for
|
|
|
|
|
people who want to learn from others how to best explain the benefits of
|
|
|
|
|
software freedom.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-30 13:18:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<p>Regards,<br /> <a href="/about/people/kirschner/kirschner.html">Matthias Kirschner</a>- FSFE</p>
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>-- <br />
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="/index.html">Free Software Foundation Europe</a><br />
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="/news/news.rss">FSFE News</a><br />
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="/events/events.rss">Upcoming FSFE Events</a><br />
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://planet.fsfe.org/en/rss20.xml">Fellowship Blog Aggregation</a><br />
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="/contact/community.html">Free Software Discussions</a> </p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
2010-12-07 16:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<tags>
|
2020-04-26 11:32:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
<tag key="newsletter"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="matthias-kirschner"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="gpl">GNU GPL</tag>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="licensing"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="europeancommission"/>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="openforumeurope">Open Forum Europe</tag>
|
|
|
|
|
<tag key="webmasters"/>
|
2010-12-07 16:39:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
</tags>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-06-29 12:41:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
|
|
|
Local Variables: ***
|
|
|
|
|
mode: xml ***
|
|
|
|
|
End: ***
|
|
|
|
|
-->
|